Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an NDPS case but withdrew the petition after the court noted incomplete disclosure of criminal antecedents. Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh with full particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.41981 of 2024
Date of Decision: 29.08.2024
Kamaljit Kaur @ Kamaljeet Kaur @ Kamla
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
… Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Ramnish Puri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Swati Batra, DAG, Punjab (Through video conferencing).
ANOOP CHITKARA, J .
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | 21.06.2024 | Aur, District SBS | 21 (section 29 added later on) of NDPS |
| Nagar | Act,1985 |
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 29.08.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No.
Sonia Puri 2024.08.30 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Kamaljit Kaur @ Kamaljeet Kaur @ Kamla
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
