Petition seeking directions to respondents to decide a pending representation dated 05.07.2024. State counsel stated the representation already stands decided, so no order was required; the petition was disposed of with liberty to return if needed.
Liberty reserved to petitioner to approach the Court again if need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
118 CRM-M-40368-2024
Date of Decision: 28.08.2024
Khushwinder Singh ......... Pe��oner Versus State of Punjab and others ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Ms. Swa� Batra, D.A.G., Punjab. (through video conferencing).
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to counsel for the pe��oner. State counsel submits that representa�on dated 05.07.2024 (Annexure P-2) already stands decided as such, no ac�on is required to be taken on the same.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
28.08.2024 Jyo�-II
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
JYOTI 2024.08.29 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Khushwinder Singh
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
