Petitioners sought to withdraw their petition after amicable settlement with the respondent, producing a magistrate's order dated 21.10.2024 on record. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-38913-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-24.10.2024
Chander Prakash Sharma @ Chandra Prakash Sharma and others
… Petitioners
Versus
M/s Vikas Stainless Steel India Pvt. Ltd.
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate for Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate for Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, learned counsel representing the petitioner submitted that since the parties have amicably resolved their issues, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the intant petition. Learned counsel, in this regard, has produced a photocopy of order dated 21.10.2024 passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad, which is taken on record.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
24.10.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.10.24 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Chander Prakash Sharma @ Chandra Prakash Sharma and others
M/s Vikas Stainless Steel India Pvt. Ltd.
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
