Petitioners sought quashing of FIR No.22, PS Jhander, Amritsar, for assault-related offences after reaching a compromise with the complainant. The trial court confirmed the compromise was voluntary. Following the Full Bench ruling in Kulwinder Singh, the High Court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-34862-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 24.10.2024
Mejar Singh alias Major Singh and others
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Kushagra Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Japjot Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Ankush Rampal, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
MOHAN SINGH 2024.10.25 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CRM-M-34862-2024 (O&M) - 2 -
| 24.10.2024 mohan |
(GURVIN | DER SINGH GILL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
MOHAN SINGH 2024.10.25 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an FIR under Sections 323, 427, 452, 506, 34 IPC can be quashed on the basis of a voluntary compromise between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of PunjabRelied on
2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab
5 provisions across 1 enactments
Mejar Singh alias Major Singh
Gurpreet Singh
Sawinder Singh @ Surinder Singh
State of Punjab
Nishan Singh
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
