This order quashed FIR No.218 and subsequent proceedings based on a voluntary compromise between parties, relying on the Full Bench precedent of Kulwinder Singh.
The petitioner's petition was allowed and FIR No.218 and subsequent proceedings were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-36059-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:-23.9.2024
Mohit and others … Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:None for the petitioners.
Mr. Praveen Bhadu, AAG, Haryana.
Ms. Jagminder Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Randeep S. Dhull, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
GEETA RANI 2024.09.23 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-M-36059-2023 (O&M)
( 2 )
23.9.2024
geeta
( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Judge
Whether reasoned/speaking
Yes / No
Whether reportable Yes / No
GEETA RANI 2024.09.23 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR under Sections 148, 149, 323, 379-A IPC can be quashed in the light of a compromise between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of PunjabExplained¶6
2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab
Mohit and others
State of Haryana and others
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
