A one-line order allowing the petition, with the court directing that detailed reasons be seen in its same-day order in CRM-M-35498-2024. No independent reasoning is set out here.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-35520-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-35520-2024 (O&M)
Reserved on: 02.09.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 13.09.2024
Manpreet Singh and others State of Punjab and others
sw ... Petitioner(s) Versus
…Respondent (s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Nitin Narula, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab. ***
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Allowed.
For detailed order, see order of even date passed in CRM-M-35498-2024.
| (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|
| September����2024 AK |
|
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes |
| Whether reportable | : No |
ASHWANI KUMAR 2024.09.13 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
1
Manpreet Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
