Bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in a murder FIR was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file fresh; disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
255
CRM-M-24627-2024
Date of Decision: 13.09.2024
Avtar Singh ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Ms. Puja Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | 02.04.2023 | Sadar Nabha, District Patiala | 302 & 34 IPC |
The petitioner incarcerated his arrest in the FIR captioned above, has come up
before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 439 CrPC.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
13.09.2024
anju rani
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable? No
ANJU RANI 2024.09.16 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Avtar Singh
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
