Petitioners withdrew their petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-33723-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 02.12.2024
Sunil Kumar and others … Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Neeraj Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Himanshu Munjal, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition at this stage.
In view of the aforesaid request, the present petition is
dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage.
| 02.12.2024 mohan |
(GURVIN | DER SINGH GILL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
MOHAN SINGH 2024.12.02 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Sunil Kumar and others
State of Haryana and others
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
