Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition, stating the trial was proceeding at a good pace and the Amicus Curiae was regularly assisting. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and appreciated the role of the Amicus Curiae.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-11053-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.12.2024
Naveen K umar …Petitioner
Versus
State of P unjab & others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present: Ms. Puja Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sidharth Attri, AAG, Pu n jab. Mr. Anish Verma, Advocate, for Mr. Naveen Bahl, Advocate a s Amicus Curiae.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, l e arned counsel for the petitione r expresse d that the trial is proceeding a t a fairly good pace and tha t Mr.Nave e n Bahl, who had been appointed as Amicus Curiae, has bee n appearin g regularly and is fully assisting t he trial Court.
Learned counsel, thus, s u bmits that in view of th e aforestat e d position, wherein the petitio n er is satisfied with the progres s of the c a se particularly with the effort s being put in by the Amicu s Curiae, h e may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition.
In view of the aforesaid sub m ission, the petition is dismisse d
as withdr a wn.
The role of the Amicus Curi a e is ‘appreciated’.
02.12.2024
Vimal
(GURVINDER SINGH GILL) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
VIMAL KUMAR 2024.12.02 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Naveen Kumar
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
