Anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a POCSO and child marriage FIR. Counsel sought withdrawal at the outset; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE H IGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 202 CR M -M-32614-2024
Dat e of Decision: 19.12.2024
Kulwinder Kaur
.… Petitioner
Versus
State of P u njab .... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Ms. Kudrat Sareen, Advocate for Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate for th e petitioner.
Ms. Aakanksha Gupta, AAG, Punjab.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in this 1st petition file d under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant o f pre-arrest bail to the petitio n er in case FIR No. 23 dated 10.04.202 4 registered under Sections 9 an d 10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage A ct, 2006; Sections 376 and 1 2 0-B IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen c es Act, 2012 at Police Station Balachaur, District SBS Nagar.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she m a y be permitted to withdraw the p resent petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
19.12.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.12.19 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 23 dated 10.04.2024.
6 provisions across 4 enactments
Kulwinder Kaur
State of Punjab
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
