Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition as he was a proclaimed offender not in India; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
102
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-31528-2024 Decided on:05.07.2024
Amrinderjit Singh
.... Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present: Mr. J.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Manjari Nehru Kaul, J. (Oral)
After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the instant petition in view of the fact that the petitioner is a proclaimed offender and admittedly, not in India.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
05.07.2024 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No
SONIA BURA 2024.07.05 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Amrinderjit Singh
State of Punjab
Manjari Nehru Kaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
