A short order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court adopting by reference a detailed order of even date passed in another case; no independent substantive decision or reasoning appears in this document.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
��
�����������������
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
����������������� ����������������������� ��������������������������
Om Parkash Dhall and another ......Petitioners
Vs.
M/s Rakesh Kumar Ramesh Kumar Trading Co. and others......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Deepak Vashisth, Advocate and
Mr. Amandeep Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Vivek Dahiya, Advocate and Mr. B.S. Sudan, Advocate for the respondent(s).
ANOOP CHITKARA J.
For detailed order, see the order of even date passed in CRM-M-16624-
2023 titled as Rakesh Kumar vs. M/s Kissan Commission Agent and others.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 26.09.2024 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: NO.
ANJU RANI 2024.09.27 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
Om Parkash Dhall and another
M/s Rakesh Kumar Ramesh Kumar Trading Co. and others
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
