Disposed

Madan Lal v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC27 Feb 2024CRM-M/272/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition for anticipatory bail in an FIR concerning cheating, forgery and criminal breach of trust. After settlement — plot transferred back and Rs.15 lakh paid to complainant — interim order made absolute with conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 24.02.2022 made absolute; anticipatory bail granted subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions and appearance before Investigating Agency as required.

Madan Lal Vs State of Haryana — Cheating and Forgery | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

CRM-M-272-2022

2024:PHHC:028870

209

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶6

CRM-M-272-2022 Date of Decision:27.02.2024

Madan Lal

....Petitioner

Vs.

State of Haryana

....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

¶13

Present : Mr. K.S. Bal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶14

Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

¶15

¶16

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

¶17

[1] Through this petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in FIR No.435 dated 24.10.2021 under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC registered at Police Station Sector-9, Ambala City.

¶18

[2] On 12.02.2024, following order was passed:-

¶19

“In pursuance of the last order, a demand draft amounting to Rs.10,00,000/- (Rs. Ten Lakh only) has been handed over by learned counsel for the petitioner to the learned counsel representing the complainant.

¶20

The parties are also present in-person in Court and assure that they would appear before the office of Sub-Registrar, Zirakpur on 19.02.2024 for the remaining compliance as regards transfer of plot in question back in the name of the petitioner.

¶21

List on 27.02.2024.

¶22

Interim order to continue.”

¶23

[3] In pursuance thereof, both the parties are ad idem that plot in

¶24

MONIKA RANI 2024.02.29 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order

CRM-M-272-2022

2024:PHHC:028870

question now stands transferred in favour of the petitioner against which a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- has been paid to respondent No.2/complainant and thus, no dispute remains pending between the parties.

¶29

[4] Even otherwise the petitioner is no more required for further investigation as per the learned State counsel.

¶30

[5] Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 24.02.2022 passed by this Court is made absolute, however, the petitioners shall keep on appearing before the Investigating Agency as and when required and shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) CrPC.

¶31

[6] Disposed of accordingly.

¶32

27.02.2024 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) monika JUDGE

¶33

Whether Speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶34

MONIKA RANI 2024.02.29 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order

Madan Lal v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madan Lal v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuldeep Singh Vs State of Punjab

Brinder Singh Vs State of Punjab

Bahadar Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Balkar Singh Alias Bali Vs State of Punjab

Hardev Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Harbans Singh Vs State of Punjab