Petition seeking protection from obstruction in plying a vehicle was disposed of as infructuous after counsel stated it had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
256
2024:PHHC:026352
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-4621-2024
Date of Decision: February 26, 2024
BAHADAR SINGH
........Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
........Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
By way of present petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, prayer has been made for directing respondents No.1 to 3 to ensure that there is no obstruction in plying of vehicle by petitioner at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present
petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
26.02.2024 (HARKESH MANUJA)
Tejwinder
| JUDGE | |
|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.02.27 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bahadar Singh
State of Punjab
Respondent No.4
Respondent No.5
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
