Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of an order passed by a Judicial Magistrate. Counsel stated the petitioner had been acquitted by the trial Court, rendering the petition infructuous; the respondent's counsel did not dispute this.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE H IGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 230 CR M -M-25859-2017
Dat e of Decision: 04.09.2024
Gagandee p Singh Saini .… Petitioner
Versus
Ravinder K aur .... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Advocate f o r the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate f or the respondent.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in this petition filed u n der Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing o f order dated 14.06.2017 (Anne x ure P-8) passed by the learned Judicial M a gistrate Ist Class, Hoshiarpur.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the i n stant petition has been rend e red infructuous and may be disposed of as such as, the petitioner stan d s acquitted by the learned trial Court.
Learned counsel for resp o ndent has not disputed the aforesaid s u bmission of learned counsel fo r the petitioner.
In view of the above, the ins t ant petition stands disposed of, as having b een rendered infructuous.
04.09.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.09.06 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gagandeep Singh Saini
Ravinder Kaur
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
