Disposed
Davinder Sharma v. State of Punjab and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/19854/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
266 CRM-M-19854 of 2021(O&M) Date of Decision: 23.10.2024
Davinder Sharma
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab and Ors.
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present: Mr. A.P. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Malkiat Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Maninder Arora, Advocate for respondent Nos.7 & 8.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)
Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C is for issuing necessary directions to respondent No.2 to transfer the investigation/enquiry of complaint bearing No.674 PDGP dated 29.09.2020 and complaint dated 02.03.2020 filed against the petitioner and his family with a view to harass him and his family and to put him in position to compromise his litigation with respondent No.7.
Upon notice, a reply by way of affidavit dated 22.10.2024 of Dhanpreet Kaur IPS, IGP, Ludhiana Range, Ludhiana has been filed along with the enquiry report, which is taken on record. Copy has been furnished to counsel opposite.
Learned State counsel would submit that in the wake of contents of the enquiry report (Annexure R-1/T) as also the reply, no grievance is left as far as prayer made in this petition is concerned and the same may be disposed of as having become infructuous.
Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to take recourse to any other alternative legal remedy, as per law, if so advised.
23.10.2024 manoj
( SANDEEP MOUDGIL ) JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No
MANOJ KUMAR 2024.10.25 03:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Davinder Sharma
State of Punjab
Sandeep Moudgil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court