The court recorded that the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
117 CRM-M-12621-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.10.2024
Vidya Devi and others
.… Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Surinder Kumar Dagar, DAG, Haryana.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the present petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C. 1973, for quashing of FIR No.132 dated 01.12.2020 (Annexure P-1) 506, under Sections 323,406,498-A, 509 r/w 34 IPC 1860, registered at Police Station Women West Gurugram, District Gurugram, alongwith all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
After arguing the matter for some time, when this Court is not inclined to grant the prayer made, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
23.10.2024 (NIDHI GUPTA) Divyanshi JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
DIVYANSHI 2024.10.24 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vidya Devi and others
State of Haryana and another
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
