Cross-reference order in a maintenance revision petition; the court directed that orders be seen in connected matter CRR-F-285-2021 and disposed of the case accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
218 Date of order: 08.05.2024
CRR-F-169-2021(O&M)
Arun Khardwal
…..Petitioner(s)
Vs.
Urmila & Others
…..Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, Adv o cate for the petitioners (in CR R -F-285-2021) (through VC).
Mr. Ashish Sanghi, Advocate for the petitioner/husba n d (in CRR-F-169-2021).
Nidhi Gupta, J.
For orders, see CRR-F- 2 85-2021 titled as “Urmila &
Others Vs. A r un Khardwal”.
(Nidhi Gupta)
08.05.2024 (Nidhi Gupta) Sunena Judge Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SUNENA 2024.05.10 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Arun Khardwal
Urmila & Others
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
