in Ex. PW7/A, thus the prosecutrix, at the time of commission of the alleged offence, was a minor, wherebys she became disabled to purvey a valid consent to the accused to subject her to coitus. Moreover, though therebys any exculpatory plea erected by the defence founded, upon, the alleged sexual intercourse being a sequel of consent being purveyed by the prosecutrix to the accused, but obviously would loose its evidentiary worth. 19. Emphasizingly, yet an incisive scrutiny is required to be made vis-a-vis the factum probandum whether Ex. PW7/A, thus cogently establishes the narration thereins, that at the time of the commission of the offence, the prosecutrix was a minor, and, as such she was completely disabled to purvey any valid consent to the accused to subject her to coitus. 20. Ex.PW7/A became proven by PW-7 Kamaljit, Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Chak Des Raj, Jalandhar. The said exhibit is the admission and withdrawal register appertaining to the prosecutrix. In the said exhibit, the prosecutrix is spoken to be born on 18.8.1999. In proof of supra exhibit, PW-7 stepped into the witness box. Though, in her examination-in-chief, she made echoings whch are in alignment with the supra speaking(s) occurring in the admission and withdrawal certificate issued by her to the prosecutrix. However, though the said certificate is issued during the course of performance of her duties, as the Principal of a Government institution, wherebys theretos, thus in consonance with the provisions engrafted in Section 35 of the Indian Evident Act, provisions whereof become extracted hereinafter, but a presumption of truth is attached. Importantly when the said presumption of truth is attachable to the preparation of records by a public servant during the
