A 2010 revision petition concerning land acquisition was called twice with no appearance for the petitioner despite prior notice that no further adjournment would be granted; the High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:022030
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
215-1 CR No.5377 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.02.2024 Surjit Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS Land Acquisition Collector (Improvement Trust) Ropar and Others …..Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for respondent No.2.
None for remaining respondents.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
“A written request for an adjournment has been circulated on behalf of counsel for the petitioners on the ground that he is in personal difficulty.
Adjourned to 15.02.2024.
It is made clear that no further adjournment shall
be granted since the matter pertains to the year 2010.”
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.02.16 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
CR No.5377 of 2010
-2-
2024:PHHC:022030
to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution.
( ALKA SARIN ) 15.02.2024 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.02.16 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
Surjit Singh
Land Acquisition Collector (Improvement Trust) Ropar
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
