Karanpreet Kaur v. Vishaljit Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
A transfer application dismissed as infructuous after counsel reported that the parties had effected a compromise; nothing of general application was decided.
A transfer application dismissed as infructuous after counsel reported that the parties had effected a compromise; nothing of general application was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.202-1
TA-195-2021 Date of Decision: 02.08.2024
KARANPREET KAUR
....Applicant
Versus
VISHALJIT SINGH
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Ms. Malika Sobti, Advocate for Ms. Satpreet Grewal Kapila, Advocate for the applicant.
None for the respondent.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the instant transfer application has become infrcutuous, as the compromise has been effected between the parties.
In view of the submission, so made, the instant transfer application is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ARCHANA PURI) 02.08.2024 JUDGE ���� Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sonu 2024.08.02 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Karanpreet Kaur
Vishaljit Singh
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court