The Court held that the revision-petition is infructuous as the underlying Civil Suit was decided on 02.12.2021, and disposed of the petition accordingly.
The revision-petition was disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
259
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.6550 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.05.2024
Amar Lal Babbar
…..Revisionist-Petitioner.
Versus
Kishan Sihag
.....Respondent.
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Naveen Jhajholia, Advocate for the revisionist-petitioner.
None for the respondent. (As per order dated 13.12.2016, the respondent was served through his son but none appeared on his behalf)
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J . (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner inform the Court that the instant revision-petition has become infructuous as the Civil Suit, out of which it had arisen, has already been decided by the concerned trial Court vide judgment dated 02.12.2021 and they pray that this revisionpetition be disposed of accordingly.
as having been rendered infructuous.
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) May 17, 2024 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable: No
YAG DUTT 2024.05.17 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision-petition is infructuous due to the decision of the underlying Civil Suit.
Amar Lal Babbar
Kishan Sihag
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
