The petitioner withdrew his criminal petition after counsel's statement. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-5025-2024 Date of Decision: September 03, 2024
Surinder Singh
…Pe00oner
Versus
Satnam Singh
…Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Navrajdeep Singh, Advocate for the pe��oner.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
A�er arguing for some �me, statement is made by learned counsel for the pe��oner, so as to withdraw this pe��on.
In view of the aforesaid statement, present pe��on is dismissed as withdrawn.
September 03, 2024 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2024.09.03 02:27 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
Surinder Singh
Satnam Singh
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
