Civil revision by the National Highways Authority of India against execution-court orders was dismissed after counsel stated the petition had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(110-2) CR-427-2023 (O&M) Date of decision:- 17.05.2024
National Highways Authority of India ...Petitioner Versus Kiran Bala and another ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present:- Mr. K.P.Singh, Advocate for
Mr. Kanwalvir Singh Kang, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Nitin Sachdeva, Advocate For respondents No.1 and 2.
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
(SUVIR SEHGAL) 17.05.2024 JUDGE Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2024.05.17 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
National Highways Authority of India
Kiran Bala
Respondent No. 2
Suvir Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
