National Highways Authority of India filed a revision petition seeking setting aside of six orders; counsel stated the petition had become infructuous, and the High Court dismissed it as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
259-2 CR-797-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.05.2024
National Hi g hways Authority of India
... Petitioner
V/S
Baljit Sing h and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present: Mr. K.P.Singh, Advocate for Mr. K.S. Kang, Advocate for t h e petitioner.
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)
become inf r uctuous.
| 15.05 | .2024 | (SUVIR SEHGAL) |
|---|---|---|
| pooja | saini ��������� ����������������� |
**JUDGE ** ������ |
| WhetherR eportable |
Yes/No |
Pooja Saini 2024.05.17 16:12 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment
National Highways Authority of India
Baljit Singh and others
Suvir Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
