The High Court dismissed a year-old revision petition for non-prosecution due to the unavailability of the file and paper book, noting the petitioner's apparent lack of interest and long delay in seeking a hearing. Pending applications were also disposed off.
Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:030774
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
148-2
CR-3463-1991 (O&M) Date of decision : 04.03.2024
Ravinder Nath Mittal ... Petitioner(s) Versus Sushila Devi ...Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the petitioner.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
04.03.2024 Ankur
(ALKA SARIN) JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Ankur Goyal 2024.03.05 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ravinder Nath Mittal
Sushila Devi
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
