Petitioners stated the petition had been rendered infructuous. The High Court dismissed it as infructuous and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
311 CR-2227-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.12.2024
JAGDISH KUMAR AND ANR .... Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS .... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. AG Haryana for respondent No.1.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
09.12.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2024.12.10 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Jagdish Kumar
State of Haryana
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
