Revision petition against a Workmen's Compensation Commissioner order, pending since 2012 for non-service of Nepali claimants, dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the petitioner hospital had shut down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
107
CR-3946-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 05.12.2024
M/s Nirmal Hospital, Karnal through Ram Gopal
....Petitioner
VERSUS
Devi Khanal and Others ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
‘ Notices issued to respondents no.1 to 4 by foreign registered AD post not received back served or otherwise. Respondents no.1 to 4 herein who are claimants before the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act are residents of Nepal. It has not been possible to serve them. Accordingly, this revision petition is adjourned sine die and may be got revived if and when respondents no.1 to 4 herein take any proceedings for execution of ex parte order passed by the Commissioner.’
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks some time to get his instructions. On his request, adjourned to 06.09.2024. To be shown in the urgent list.”
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.12.09 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CR-3946-2011
-2-
( ALKA SARIN ) 05.12.2024 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.12.09 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Nirmal Hospital, Karnal through Ram Gopal
Devi Khanal
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
