Petitioner sought withdrawal of the bail-related petition after arguing for some time; counsel stated intention to withdraw, and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without recording any substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
208
CRM-M-10995-2024
Date of Decision: 12.08.2024
SATNAM SINGH @ SATTU …..Pe++oner Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB …..Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Eklavya Darsi, DAG, Punjab.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Custody cer�ficate filed by the State is taken on record.
A%er arguing for some �me, statement is made by learned counsel
for the pe��oner so as to withdraw this pe��on.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the present pe��on is dismissed as withdrawn.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) 12.08.2024 JUDGE pry Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
PRIYANKA 2024.08.12 18:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Satnam Singh @ Sattu
State of Punjab
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
