Appeal dismissed as withdrawn on the appellant's application for withdrawal; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
101+1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-38253-2024 in/and CRA-D-911-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.09.2024
GURWINDE R SINGH @ GURPREET @ GOP I
. . . . Appellan t
Vs.
STATE OF P U NJAB
. . . . Responden t
****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: M r. G.S. Ghuman, Advocate f or the appellant.
M r. S.S. Gill, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
M r. Sukhdeep Singh Sandhu, NIA P rosecutor.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
P resent application has been fil e d for withdrawal of the presen t
Appeal i.e. C R A-D-911-2024 .
F or the reasons stated in the app l ication, the same is allowed.
P resent Appeal i.e. CRA-D-911- 2 024 is dismissed as withdrawn. P ending application(s), if a n y, also stands disposed o f
accordingly.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
September 27, 2024
Mohit goyal
1. Wheth e r speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Wheth e r reportable? Yes/No
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.09.27 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gurwinder Singh @ Gurpreet @ Gopi
State of Punjab
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Manisha Batra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
