Satender Pal v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
����������������������������������������…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
� � � �� ��� � � ���� �!�"#$%�&�$ '$$� �$�$($ � �� � � � �)+,�-.�/,0121-3�44 � �+,3/,5�6� �444477,663+� � 8,5292 � � ++, � -. � 5:3 � 3/ � +;,52 � � 444,27-3/,3+2� � $<= �� >%? � < @ � #A � $<$ � $($ ' � � BBBBB � � 5,2,3+ �� 54 � CD/,,7 � 13D;E � /F-0*+, � .-5 � � 54 � G44 � )/H6E � /F-0*+, � .-5 � +;, � 77,663+ � � 54 � CD/12; � 30;3/E � //64 � I � 5:3 � � BBBBB � � $<$ � $($ 'J � #@ � � 4 � � ;66,3D, �� 13 �� +;,��75,2,3+��5,D965��2,0-3/��77,6��12��+-��+;,��K9/DL,3+��3/� � /,05,, �� /+,/ �� 44 �� 722,/��M:��6,53,/��//1+1-36��)12+510+��C9/D,E��N51/M/� � 2,++13D �� 21/, �� +;, �� K9/DL,3+ � �3/��/,05,,��/+,/�� 4 4 ��722,/��M:��6,53,/��1F16 � � C9/D, �� C54 �� )1F121-3E �� H;,5,M:��+;,��291+��.-5��/,065+1-3��3/��L3/+-5:��13K930+1-3� �H2�/,05,,/�13�.F-95�-.�+;,�7613+1..77,663+4� � 4 � � O;, �� .0+2 �� 13 �� * �� 39+2;,66 �� 5, �� +;+ �� +;, �� 7613+1..77,663+ �� H2 �� H-5P13D �� 2 � � O,;216 �� Q,6.5, �� ..10,5E �� H;,3 �� * �� 0-L7613+ �� 66,D13D �� /,L3/13D �� -. �� L-3,: �� .5-L � � 061,3+2 �� H2 �� 132+1+9+,/ �� 3/ �� .+,5 �� * �� 75,61L135: �� 5,7-5+E �� ;, �� H2 �� 760,/ �� 93/,5� authenticity of this order/judgment � 2927,321-3 �� H4,4.4 �� 4 4RE �� H;16, �� M,13D �� D53+,/��-36:��29M212+,30,��66-H30,4� �O;,5,M:E��F1/,��-5/,5��/+,/��4 4E��;,��H2��5,132++,/��H1+;��+;,��0-3/1+1-3��+;*+��+;,�
| 2024.01.05 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and |
|---|
authenticity of this order/judgment |
MOHIT
� � � �� ��� � � ��� �� !!"# �� $ �� �� !!% �� % �� " �� & �� ' �� (" �� ")� � ! �� ( �� "'"! �� +$, �� -) �� ") �� !!" �� " �� )' �� " � � ./ �� )'" �� ( �� 0% �� % �� ' �� . �� �� " �� ,,� � �� 1,,, �� 2")/ �� " �� % �� " ���� , ,3 �� ")" �� ) �� �� � � %!! �� & �� *! �� "% �� !. �� ( �� ") �� 4 �� �� &" �� ) �� %*! �� " �� & �� ""! �� "� � $ �� $'" �� 5 " �� ( �� ") �� *&" �� !!% �� !$ �� ., �� -) �� ") �� !' � � ( �� &! �� '" �� % �� 6"/ �� ") �� " �� % �� (! �� ( �� !" �� �� '"$ � � 6", � � , � �7)��("��""��")��"��.��%""��""'"����")� � !'$����")"��"��%��"��'"&!������ !��%��(!,����'"/� �"��%��""��")"����!!"��"�� .��"��")�� !"((/��")� � )'"��%��.����!��,��(��6&��.!��.��!�� )("� �(�"��")�8*!9,� �1,� �7)��"!��"����")��"����(.��(��")�� !"(( !!"��&$� �&.��")"��"))��")�� )'"����"�� ,, �� �� 1,, � �%��.!����!����(��")��!��&"��")��("��)���� %��"��'($� �")'��!�!!�")�&(",� �,� � . �� ")%")/ �� ") �� (" " �� (! ���� ! � � &( �� ") �� ! �� !!" �� "/��%))��'��"��&��!!%��&$��(��")��"!� �"#��&."��"��&������"��")��!%,��:"��%��)!��")"����")� �""'"����'"��")"��")�� �� ��%!!��&����("��")� authenticity of this order/judgment � "'"!�� /��"��%))����)!!��%��'����!����%��"�� � � "��(��!!%����""'"��&"��!��,/��")��("��)"!$�� � �")�' *���")� !"((�%�"�5"��")� ,�
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/837/2002
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court