The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the appeal filed by plaintiffs-appellants for possession by pre-emption as non-prosecution after finding that key appellants and respondents had died without representation.
Appeal dismissed as non-prosecution due to death of parties and lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:156598 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
209 RSA-2157-1992 Date of decision: 07.12.2023
Yusuf and others ....Appellants
Versus
Nafis Ahmed and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J (ORAL)
1. The present appeal is filed against concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Courts below in a suit filed by the plaintiffs-appellants for possession by pre-emption.
2. As per office report, appellant No.1 has died and appellant Nos.2 and 3 has been served. However, there is no representation on their behalf and respondent Nos. 1 and 3 have also died.
3. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
at the last known address, as also to the concerned SHO of the area to intimate the same.
order.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
| 07.12.2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hemant | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
|
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
HAMANT 2023.12.08 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal for possession by pre-emption should be disposed of due to death of key parties and lack of representation?
Yusuf and others
Nafis Ahmed and others
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
