The High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution due to repeated failure of parties to appear, with notices unserved due to incomplete addresses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:156657
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
223 RSA-2097-1993 Date of decision: 07.12.2023
Smt Udham Kaur ....Appellant
Versus
Pritam Chand ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J (ORAL)
1. The challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment of reversal
at the hands of plaintiff who had filed a suit for possession and recovery of mortgage amount.
2. On the last date of hearing, the case was called out twice but none had appeared, thus notice for actual date was issued to the parties.
3. As per office report, notice issued to appellant No. i, i(b), ii and iii and the sole respondent have been received back with the report unserved due to incomplete address.
present appeal for non-prosecution.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
07.12.2023 Hemant
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
HAMANT 2023.12.12 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Smt Udham Kaur
Pritam Chand
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
