The High Court dismissed an appeal challenging a lower appellate court finding on a possession suit, citing the appellants' non-prosecution and inability to contact clients.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; three months granted for recalling the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:144863
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
211
RSA-1288-1991 (O&M) & XOBJ-7-C-1991 Date of decision: 15.11.2023
Thaman Singh and Others
....Appellants
Versus
Ajmer Kaur
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
*********
Present : Mr. R.S. Randhawa and Ms. Tarranum Madan, Advocates for the appellants
Mr. M.K. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the respondent
*********
AMAN CHAUDHARY. J.
MOHIT 2023.11.17 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
RSA-1288-1991 (O&M)
-2-
withdrawn pursuant to the aforesaid order.
order.
| (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|
| November 15, 2023 | |
| M.Kamra | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes / No |
| Whether reportable | : Yes / No |
MOHIT 2023.11.17 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Thaman Singh and Others
Ajmer Kaur
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
