Oral order by a single judge where the appellant failed to appear. The matter was dismissed in default due to lack of interest by the appellant.
Appeal dismissed in default due to non-appearance of appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
208
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1783-1990 (O&M) Date of decision: February 07, 2023
Dalip Singh
….Appellant
versus
Saraj Kaur
….Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: - None for the appellant.
Mrs. Gurnam Kaur Turka, Advocate for the respondent.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Case was earlier taken up for hearing on 07.04.2017 but no one caused appearance. Same has been the position on subsequent dates as well. Today also, none appears on behalf of the appellant. It seems that appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter.
Dismissed in default.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE
February 07, 2023 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MAHAVIR SINGH 2023.02.08 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
Dalip Singh
Saraj Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
