Regular second appeal challenging findings in a suit for possession by redemption. Appeal disposed of as infructuous because the subject shop was acquired and compensation paid.
The appeal was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:161856
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
230
RSA-1622-1994 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.12.2023
Sher Singh
....Defendant-Appellant
Versus
Chander Bhan
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Mrinal Dewan, Advocate for Mr. S.P. Laler, Advocate, for the appellant.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J.
2 . Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the shop in question which was under his tenancy has since been acquired and compensation thereof has been paid to the respondent-owner, therefore, the present appeal be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
3 . Ordered accordingly.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
16.12.2023
Ankur
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Ankur Goyal 2023.12.16 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Sher Singh
Chander Bhan
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
