The regular second appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel for the appellants stated they had no instructions. A period of three months was granted for seeking recall of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:161759
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
204
RSA-1336-1992 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.12.2023
Lal Chand and Others
....Appellants
Versus
Attar Singh
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present:Mr. G.S. Bidhan, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate for the appellants
AMAN CHAUDHARY. J.
1 . Challenge in the present regular second appeal is to the reversal findings of fact returned by the Courts below in a suit filed by the plaintiffrespondent for permanent injunction.
2 . As per office note, notice issued to appellant Nos.1 and 2 have been received back served and they had informed of a compromise arrived at many years ago, while appellant No.3 and the sole respondent are reportedly no more.
last known address, as also to the concerned SHO of the area to intimate the same.
order.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE
16.12.2023 M.Kamra
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
MOHIT 2023.12.18 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Lal Chand
Attar Singh
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
