Dhiman Poultry Farm v. Bank of Baroda and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
103
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RA-CW-211-2022 in CWP No.9198 of 2022 Date of Decision: 17.02.2022
DHIMAN POULTRY FARM .…...Review-Applicant
V/s.
BANK OF BARODA AND ANOTHER .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN.
Present: None for the review-applicant.
Mr. Satinder Pal Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sushil K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for Mr. C.S. Pasricha, Addvocate, for the non-applicant/respondent-Bank
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J. (Oral)
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the review-applicant today. Even on the last date of hearing i.e. on 02.12.2022, there was no representation on review-applicant’s behalf. In view thereof, this Review Application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of accordingly.
(M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO) JUDGE
(HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN) JUDGE
| February 17, 2023 Ess Kay |
|
|---|---|
| Whether speaking / reasoned | : Yes /No. |
| Whether Reportable | : Yes/No |
SURESH KUMAR 2023.02.21 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
BANK OF BARODA AND ANOTHER
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court