The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition holding that the petitioner had an effective alternative remedy under the Cr.P.C. The petition was disposed of after granting liberty to approach the alternative forum.
The Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to avail the alternative remedy under the Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 25145 of 2022 Date of Decision: November 01, 2022
Sunil Dutta
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.S. Madaan
Present:Mr. Rooheen Kalra, Mr. Piyush Goel, Mr. Neeraj Shukla, Advocates for the petitioner.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J. (Oral)
Heard counsel for the petitioner.
Since we are satisfied that the petitioner has an effective
remedy under the provisions of Cr.P.C. for the reliefs claimed in the Writ Petition, we are not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition.
Granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the said alternative remedy, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Judge
(H.S. Madaan) Judge November 01, 2022 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether Reportable? Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2022.11.02 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition should be entertained when an effective alternative remedy exists under the Cr.P.C.
Sunil Dutta
State of Punjab and others
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
H.S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
