Jagtar Singh v. Rajbir Singh and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCFAO/2104/1995
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
�� ���������������������������������…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
|�
�
�
�
�
�
��
**�**
�
�
��� � � !"#�$�" %""�
�
"�"&" �
�
�
�
�
| � � '()�+,�-./0/+1�22� |
|---|
3(4)(56/147 222288*99(1) :*50;0 |
<(=>/56/147(1-+)7*50 |
� 222<08+1-1)0� � "?@�� A#B�? C�! D�"?"�" &" %� � 501)��� 02:/>7(�E(4(5F�-G+.()�,+5� � 525/)(H�6/147�6(/1/F�-G+.()�,+5�)7*�(88*99(1)2� � 52'**8(I�6;5/F�-G+.()�,+5�508+1-1)�E+2J10;5(1.� � +H8(1K2� LLLLL |
"" " " |
? & %M!C 2 J1=;5*-(8899(1) 7(0 ,/9- )7* 8501) (88*(9 0I/14 17(1.H1) +, )7 .+H810()/+1 (H+;1) (N(5-- >K )7 9*(51- +)+5 ../-*1) 9(/H0 |
O5/>;1(9F H>(9( ,+5 07+5) P)7* O5/>;1(9Q G/- (N(5- -()- 2 |
| 2 |
| F +1 (..+;1)+,)7*/1=;5/05./G->K7/H/1(H+)+5G*7/.;9(5(../-*1)2 |
� 2� � R*(51*-�� .+;109�� .+1)1-0�� )7()�� )7�� /1=;5-(8899(1)�� 7(-�� H)�� N/)7�� (1� � (../-*1)�� +1�� 2 |
| 2 F�� N75/1�� 7*�� 7(-�� 0;,,5-�� H;9)/89*�� /1=;5/0�� /1.9;-/14� � ,5(.);5�� +,�� 7/0�� 9*,)�� 94�� (1-�� (5HF�� +1�� (..+;1)�� +,�� N7/.7F�� 7�� N(0�� ;1(>9*�� )+�� 85,+5H� � N+5I2�� �� 5H(/1-�� (-H/))-�� /1�� )7�� 7+08/)(9�� ,+5�� (>+;)�� |
| �� -(K02�� )�� )7*�� )/H*�� +,�� )7*� � 0(/-�� (../-1)F�� 7�� N(0�� �� K*(50�� +9-�� (1-�� *(51/14�� <02F |
| S�� 8*5�� H+1)7�� >K�� -+/14� |
(45/.;9);5* N+5I2 O7* (88*99(1) 7(- 0;,,5- |
| T 85H(11) -/0(>/9/)K N7/.7 7(0 >**1 (0000- )+ > UT +1 (..+;1) +, 07+5)1/14 +, 94 (1- 7 /0 0)/99 )(I/14 |
� )5*()H1)�� ,+5�� /)2�� /0�� H(55/(4�� 85+08*.)0�� 7(G*�� (90+�� 4+)�� (-G509K�� (,,.)-2�� O7*� 15:37 e accuracy and his order/judgment |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAO/2104/1995
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court