Petitioners argued the petition became infructuous as the State had allegedly passed an order granting benefits. The court disposed of the petition accordingly.
The petition was disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:124067
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CWP-7266-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision:-21.09.2023
Mohinder Singh and others
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. H.K.Brinda, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Inderpreet Singh Kang, AAG, Punjab.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
Today, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since an order granting the requisite benefits is stated to have been passed by the State as had specificaly been stated by the learned State counsel on the last date of hearing, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the aforestated submission, the present petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
21.09.2023 ( GURVINDER SINGH GILL ) mohan JUDGE Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
MOHAN SINGH 2023.09.21 15:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Mohinder Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
