Dismissed

Tarlok Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Oct 2023CWP/3768/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed CM applications to record affidavit replies. Regarding the main Writ Petition, the Court held it became infructuous due to the petitioner's change of posting and disposed of it without assigning a substantive disposition type.

What did the court decide?

The Common Writ Petition standing disposed of as infructuous due to the petitioner's new place of posting.

Tarlok Singh Vs Union of India and Ors. — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

CM-5010 & 5011-CWP-2022 in/and CWP-3768-2022 -1-

¶2

2023:PHHC:130824

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

137+245 CM-5010 & 5011-CWP-2022 in/and CWP-3768-2022 Date of Decision : 09.10.2023

Tarlok Singh

......... Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and others

¶9

......... Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

¶11

Present : Mr.A.P.S.Rehan, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. P.K.Saini, Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents-UOI.

¶13

¶14

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

¶15

CM-5010-CWP-2022

¶16

Application is allowed as prayed for.

¶17

CM-5011-CWP-2022

¶18

Prayer in this application is for placing on record the reply by way of affidavit of respondents No.1 to 6 along with Annexures R-1 to R- 14.

¶19

Allowed as prayed for and the reply by way of affidavit of respondents No.1 to 6 along with Annexures R-1 to R-14 is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.

¶20

Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place.

¶21

CWP-3768-2022

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner

¶23

has joined his new place of posting, thus, the petition has rendered ANJU GOEL 2023.10.09 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶24

CM-5010 & 5011-CWP-2022 in/and CWP-3768-2022

2023:PHHC:130824

-2-

infructuous.

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the

¶29

aforesaid fact.

¶30

In view of above, the petition stands disposed of as

¶31

infructuous.

¶32

09.10.2023 anju

¶33

( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE

¶34

Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶35

ANJU GOEL 2023.10.09 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Tarlok Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tarlok Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Arya Industries Vs State of Punjab and Others

M/S Mahakaal Rice Mills Vs State of Punjab and Others

Sandeep Kumar Vs the Chief General Manager, H.R. Department and Ors.

Ramesh Kumar Khanna Vs Allahabad Bank and Ors.

Amarjit Singh Vs Central University of Haryana Mahendergarh and Anr.

Rajesh Malik Vs Union of India and Ors.