The petitioner sought a direction for the allotment of free paddy. The court disposed of the petition in terms of a judgment passed in CWP No. 22211 of 2023.
The petition was disposed of in terms of the order dated 04.10.2023 in CWP No. 22211 of 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
103 ����������������� CWP No.22602 of 2023 Date of Decision:07.10.2023
M/s Mahakaal Rice Mills
….Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Jimmy Singla, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Deepanjay Sharma, DAG, Punjab
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
07.10.2023 paramjit
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: Yes/No
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.10.07 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to direction for allotment of free paddy, considering the principle laid down in CWP No. 22211 of 2023.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s Hari Har Mega Goods vs. State of Punjab and othersFollowed¶2
CWP No. 22211 of 2023 titled as M/s Hari Har Mega Goods vs. State of Punjab and others judgment dated 04.10.2023
M/s Mahakaal Rice Mills
State of Punjab and others
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
