Disposed

Gurpeet Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC12 Oct 2023CWP/23190/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petitioner seeking regular status under the compassionate appointment scheme for his late father's post filed a writ petition. The court, without expressing an opinion on merits, directed the State to consider and decide the petitioner's earlier legal notice within four months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.1 to consider and dispose of legal notice dated 8.4.2022 within 4 months.

Gurpeet Singh Vs State of Punjab… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

2023:PHHC:133080

¶2

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh

¶3

CWP-23190-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:-12.10.2023 Gurpreet Singh ….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

¶5

Present:Mr. Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶6

¶7

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)

¶8

The petitioner’s father, who was serving as a ‘Water Career’ in Punjab Police died in harness on 15.11.2008. Upon a request made by petitioner’s mother for appointment on compassionate grounds, the petitioner was appointed on Class-IV post on compassionate basis w.e.f. 26.9.2011 on contingent paid basis. The petitioner thereafter submitted a representation dated 23.6.2016 (Annexure P-3) praying therein that he may be appointed on regular basis. However, no decision was taken upon the same. Subsequently, when the Office of respondent No.2 - Director General of Police, Punjab sought comments from the office of respondent No.4 - Senior Superintendent of Police, District S.A.S. Nagar, the petitioner was regularized against Class - IV post w.e.f. 23.10.2018.

¶9

Pankaj Kakkar 2023.10.12 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶10

CWP-23190-2023 (O&M)

¶11

( 2 )

¶12

2023:PHHC:133080

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the policy dated 21.11.2002 (Annexure P-1) issued by Government of Punjab pertaining to appointment on compassionate basis, there is no such rider that such appointment has to be made on contingent paid basis and that once the petitioner had been given appointment in the year 2011 and had been subsequently regularized, the entire service is as a matter of fact required to be treated as regular service w.e.f. the date the petitioner was initially appointed. It has been submitted that although the petitioner sent a legal notice dated 8.4.2022 (Annexure P-7) as well, but to no avail.

¶14

Notice of motion.

¶15

On asking of the Court, Mr. Inderpreet Singh Kang, AAG, Punjab, upon whom an advance copy of petition had already been served, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.

¶16

Learned State counsel submits that the legal notice, if any, received in the office shall be considered in accordance with law.

¶17

Having regard to the aforestated position but without commenting anything as regards merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and dispose of the legal notice dated 8.4.2022 (Annexure P-7) in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of 4 months from today.

¶18

12.10.2023 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge

¶19

Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No

¶20

Pankaj Kakkar 2023.10.12 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Gurpeet Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurpeet Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surmukh Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Satnam Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Daljit Singh Vs State of Punjab and Another

M/S H.S. Tuli & Sons Builders (P)Ltd Vs Union of India

M/S Haryana Ex-Services League Vs Haryana State Warehousing Corporation

Gobind Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.