Petitioner sought preponement of CWP-11072-2016 citing an earlier identical case CWP-5648-2017. Court accepted State's submission that case is covered by earlier judgment.
CWP-11072-2016 preponed and disposed in same terms as judgment in CWP-5648-2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:132923
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CM-17341-CWP-2023 in/and CWP-11072-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision:-12.10.2023 Gobind Singh ….Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. K.K. Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Inderpreet Singh Kang, AAG, Punjab.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
CM-17341-CWP-2023
By way of filing the instant application, the applicant/petitioner seeks early hearing of the main petition i.e. CWP-11072-2016, which stands admitted vide order dated 6.2.2017, on the ground that an identical case has already been disposed of by this Court vide judgment dated 16.3.2023 passed in CWP-5648-2017 titled Sukhmander Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and others .
Notice of the application to the respondent – State of Punjab.
On asking of the Court, Mr. Inderpreet Singh Kang, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court accepts notice on behalf of the respondentState.
Pankaj Kakkar 2023.10.12 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CWP-11072-2016 (O&M) ( 2 ) 2023:PHHC:132923
Learned State counsel has fairly stated that the case of applicant/petitioner would be covered by Sukhmander Singh’s case (supra) and that the instant petition may be disposed off accordingly.
In view of the aforesaid submissions and in view of the reasons mentioned in the application the same is allowed and the main case i.e. CWP11072-2016, which stands admitted vide order dated 6.2.2017, is preponed and is taken on board today and the same stands disposed of in the same terms as in Sukhmander Singh’s case (supra).
12.10.2023 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
Pankaj Kakkar 2023.10.12 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the instant petition seeking preponement and disposition in the terms of a previous identical case should be allowed.
Whether to hold that the instant petition is covered by the judgment in CWP-5648-2017.
Whether to dispose of the main case CWP-11072-2016 in same terms as CWP-5648-2017.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sukhmander Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and othersDistinguished¶11
CWP-5648-2017 Sukhmander Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and others
Gobind Singh
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
