The court disposed of the writ petition challenging the declaration of the petitioner as unfit for the post of Constable. Upon respondent's assurance to arrange re-examination, the petition was disposed of without adjudication on merits.
Petition disposed; respondent to arrange re-examination if appropriate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-19574-2023
2023:PHHC:115709
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
130
CWP-19574-2023 Date of Decision : 04.09.2023
Pankaj Kumar
......... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr.Deepak Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
ANJU GOELpresent in Court, submits that if the petitioner moves an application before 2023.09.04 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-19574-2023
2023:PHHC:115709
-2-
competent authority, the competent authority would consider and if finds appropriate, the petitioner would be re-examined. Needful would be done within a week from the date of application.
04.09.2023 anju
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
ANJU GOEL 2023.09.04 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the habeas corpus petition regarding the petitioner's declaration as unfit for the post of Constable be disposed of.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Pankaj Kumar
Union of India
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
