The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after learning that a reply dated 01.09.2023 from the Deputy Commissioner had been taken on record, rendering the petition redundant.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:115917
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
250 CWP-1401-2022 Date of Decision : 04.09.2023
Major Singh
......... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr.M.S.Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Abhaypal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) 04.09.2023 JUDGE anju
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
ANJU GOEL 2023.09.04 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Major Singh
State of Punjab
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
