Petitioners questioned whether their service as Special Police Officers counts as qualifying service. Court directed State to consider their claim within four months.
Direction to respondent No.4 to consider and dispose of the legal notice dated 8.2.2023 within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:092271
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CWP-15529-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:-21.7.2023
Davinder Kumar and others …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Krishan Kumar Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Inderpreet Singh Kang, AAG, Punjab.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2023.07.21 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
2023:PHHC:092271
CWP-15529-2023 (O&M)
( 2 )
expeditiously in accordance with rules and in accordance with the latest pronouncements of law on the subject by passing a speaking order.
21.7.2023
pankaj
( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Judge
Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2023.07.21 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether services rendered by petitioners as SPOs before absorption as Constables in Punjab Police qualify as service for pension reckoning.
Davinder Kumar and others
State of Punjab and others
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
