Petitioners sought High Court protection due to marriage against family wishes and threats. The court directed the Superintendent of Police to investigate the threat perception
Direction to Superintendent of Police to investigate threat perception and ensure safety of petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:058885
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
113
CRWP-3970-2023 Decided on : 26.04.2023
Baljinder and another
. . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: Ms. Mandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Kuljeet kaur Adhen, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)
Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to official respondents No.1 to 3, to provide protection of lives and liberty of the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of private respondents.
KAVITA NAIN 2023.04.26 12:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment
2023:PHHC:058885
CRWP-3970-2023
- 2 -
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
April 26, 2023
k.nain
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
KAVITA NAIN 2023.04.26 12:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the State should provide protection to petitioners who married against family wishes apprehending interference.
Whether such protection ensures lives and liberty without validating the marriage against civil or criminal laws.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Baljinder
Anita Kaur
State of Haryana
SANJAY VASHISTH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
