The petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition. The court noted the petitioner's age and marital separation details but, upon request, dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:058332
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
104
CRWP-3822-2023 (O&M) Decided on : 25.04.2023
AASHU DEVI AND ANOTHER
. . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: Mr. Sidhant Bhonsle, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 4.
SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)
1. Order dated 21.04.2023 passed by this Court, says as under:-
“After noticing the fact that petitioner No. 1-Aashu Devi, is aged 18 years and petitioner No. 2-Vikas Lathwal is aged 32 years, at the first instance, learned State counsel counsel is directed to verify the credentials of the petitioners.
Adjourned to 25.04.2023.”
2. Today, learned State counsel on instructions from concerned investigating officer, submits that as per preliminary enquiry conducted by the police from the villagers, it was acknowledged that earlier petitioner No. 2-Vikas Lathwal was married to someone else and got separated only through a panchayati divorce.
4. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
25.04.2023 Riya
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
RIYA 2023.04.25 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
AASHU DEVI AND ANOTHER
STATE OF HARYANA
SANJAY VASHISTH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
